...
ESCO is conducting a review ofthe Data Product Development Guide for Data Producers
This Data Product Development Guide (DPDG) for Data Producers was prepared for the Earth Observing System Data and Information System (EOSDIS) by the DPDG Working Group, one of the Earth Science Data System Working Groups (ESDSWGs), to aid in the development of NASA Earth Science data products.
The DPDG is intended for those who develop Earth Science data products and are collectively referred to as “data producers.” This guide is primarily for producers of Earth Science data products derived from remote sensing, in situ and model data that are to be archived at an EOSDIS DAAC (Distributed Active Archive Center). However, producers of other Earth Science data products will also find useful guidance.
All review comments are due by June 16, 2023
...
Section | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Section |
---|
Review IntroductionThe role of the ESDIS Standards Coordination Office (ESCO) is to conduct a review of this document by soliciting comments from a cross section of the Earth Science community. Reviewers are invited to read the document and answer the questions provided on the review web page. The ESCO recognizes that not all reviewers will be familiar with all of the content of the document. Reviewers are welcome to review those parts of the document that they have experience with. You only need to answer questions applicable to you. Additional comments are welcome. This document is intended primarily for data producers and data distributors; however data users may have insights and opinions about the content of this document as well.
Review QuestionsAfter reviewing this RFC for guidelines on developing NASA Earth Science data products, please rate the following questions on a scale of 1 to 5 where 1 = very unlikely, 2 = unlikely, 3 = neutral, 4 = likely, and 5 = very likely. (Detailed responses are also welcome.)
Please answer the following demographic questions to help us ensure responses are received from target audiences and affiliations for this RFC.
|
...