Versions Compared

Old Version 7

changes.mady.by.user Beth Huffer

Saved on

compared with

New Version 8

changes.mady.by.user Beth Huffer

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Section


Column
width5%



Column
width90%

Quick Start for Reviewers

ESDIS uses the Jama online document review system to collect community comments on proposed standards, practices and technical information submitted to ESCO for review.  Offline reviews, where you download the document and review questions, then respond via email, are also accepted. Quick instructions for each are below.

Section


Column
width50%


Panel
borderStylenone
titlePreferred Method: Use Jama

  1. Request Jama access to these documents by contacting the ESCO at esco-staff@lists.nasa.gov. Please include your Earthdata login username if you have one.

  2. Read and provide comments about the document via Jama here:
  3. For more details on using Jama, see the information at the bottom of this page.
  4. All review comments are due by June 16, 2023



Column
width50%


Panel
borderStylenone
titleAlternate Method: Respond via email
  1. Download the document:
  2. Read the document and provide additional feedback by answering the review questions:
  3. Send your feedback to the ESCO at esco-staff@lists.nasa.gov
  4. All review comments are due by June 16, 2023






Column
width5%



...

Section

Review Introduction

The role of the ESDIS Standards Coordination Office (ESCO) is to conduct a review of this document by soliciting comments from a cross section of the Earth Science community.

Reviewers are invited to read the document and answer the questions provided on the review web page. The ESCO recognizes that not all reviewers will be familiar with all of the content of the document. Reviewers are welcome to review those parts of the document that they have experience with.  You only need to answer questions applicable to you.  Additional comments are welcome.

This document is intended primarily for data producers and data distributors; however data users may have insights and opinions about the content of this document as well. There is a new companion document, also under current public review, ESDS-RFC-042 Preservation Content Implementation Guidance. Please consider reading (and reviewing) that document for further context and guidance.

Review Questions

After reviewing this RFC for guidelines on developing NASA Earth Science data products, please rate the following questions on a scale of 1 to 5 where 1 = very unlikely, 2 = unlikely, 3 = neutral, 4 = likely, and 5 = very likely. (Detailed responses are also welcome.)

  • How likely are you to support the endorsement of these NASA Earth Science data product development guidelines for use in NASA Earth science data systems?
  • How likely will this standard/topic be utilized by your organization?

Please answer the following demographic questions to help us ensure responses are received from target audiences and affiliations for this RFC. 

  • What is your role? Identify your job function such as data scientist, science communication & outreach, data management, operations, design & development, engineering, and/or any other descriptive terms.
  • Where do you work? Provide name of DAAC, project, or organization which best represents your affiliation.

...