Page History

Review Introduction

The role of the ESDIS Standards Coordination Office (ESCO) is to conduct a review of this document by soliciting comments from a cross section of the Earth Science community.

Reviewers are invited to read the document and answer the questions provided on the review web page. The ESCO recognizes that not all reviewers will be familiar with all of the content of the document. Reviewers are welcome to review those parts of the document that they have experience with.  You only need to answer questions applicable to you.  Additional comments are welcome.

SAMPLE Intro - This document is intended primarily for data producers and data distributors, ; however data users may have insights and opinions about the content of this document as well. 

There is a new companion document, also under current public review, ESDS-RFC-042 Preservation Content Implementation Guidance. Please consider reading (and reviewing) that document for further context and guidance.

Review Questions

After reviewing this RFC for <insert topic> guidelines on developing NASA Earth Science data products, please rate the following questions on a scale of 1 to 5 where 1 = very unlikely, 2 = unlikely, 3 = neutral, 4 = likely, and 5 = very likely. (Detailed responses are also welcome.)

• How likely are you to support the endorsement of <insert topic> these NASA Earth Science data product development guidelines for use in NASA Earth science data systems?
• How likely will this standard/topic be utilized by your organization?

Please answer the following demographic questions to help us ensure responses are received from target audiences and affiliations for this RFC. 

• What is your role? Identify your job function such as data scientist, science communication & outreach, data management, operations, design & development, engineering, and/or any other descriptive terms.
• Where do you work? Provide name of DAAC, project, or organization which best represents your affiliation.