Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

2021 ESIP Winter Meeting (Jan. 26th-29th, 2021)
https://2021esipwintermeeting.sched.com/

...

HTML
<style>
li {padding-bottom: .1em;}
</style>


The meeting was conducted via Qiqochat, using Zoom for presentations and breakout sessions.
Slido was used to capture audience questions and to conduct the two polls.


ESIP Session Links

...


Agenda

  • Welcome
    • Ed Armstrong (LP.DAAC, ESO): Introductory presentationSlide Poll
    • Audience poll #1 on ARD:

      Image Added

    • Audience poll #2 on ARD:

      Image Added
  • Presentations
  • Questions to the speakers (captured from the Slido tool and the Zoom chat)
    • Steven Labahn (USGS, CEOS Land Surface Imaging Virtual Constellation (LSI-VC) Co-Lead): CEOS Analysis Ready Data (ARD)
      • Does CEOS provide more granularity on what ‘use with ease and confidence’ means for a new user?
        • Reply: Ease of use - guaranteed that product is met with a certain kind of quality and standard. Showed scorecard summary tables - level of assurance around what a data product contains 
      • Are all data transformations (data and code), from original to ARD, saved? What system is used to save this history?
      • ARD is a powerful "holy grail" and CARD4L is so well-defined, is there a danger that people might think ARD is a solved problem
        • Reply: CARD4L is not trying to define all of ARD
      • Why did you decide not to specify the metadata format & data packaging? That seems like a key usability requirement.
      • In STAC, we are currently working on creating CARD4L extensions, and there are two open PRs for SAR and Optical.
      • Can you say a few more words about COAST?
    • Chris Lynnes (NASA): Analysis Ready Satellite Data in NASA’s EOSDIS
      • pixels expand near the pole simply because of the projection used. the FOVs are function of off-nadir angle only
        • One of the challenges is that the "processing level" definitions appear to be different between land and atmosphere... where in land Level-2 is gridded/ground referenced whereas that's Level-3 in the atmosphere domain
      • How might the ESIP endorsed Analytics definition be updated with ARD concepts? https://datascience.codata.org/articles/10.5334/dsj-2017-006/
      • Confounding factors?
      • In terms of "easy to used spatial characteristics", have you considered using a standardized hierarchical spatial indexing system like H3? see H3geo.org.
      • How did you create AIRS L2G time-aggregated data before you run PANDAS on it? Did you store everything in memory or save it in an intermediate format?
  • Breakout into 4 rooms