Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 13:44:55 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <1046427541.1354.1711647895291@gs-ed-prod-wiki1.earthdata.nasa.gov> Subject: Exported From Confluence MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="----=_Part_1353_7125821.1711647895289" ------=_Part_1353_7125821.1711647895289 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Location: file:///C:/exported.html
There are multiple standards within the ISO Technical Committee 211 for = geospatial standards. In many cases, multiple standards are required to ade= quately describe the unique characteristics of a dataset. In the case of IS= O 19115 compliance, the most immediately relevant ISO standards are:
Additional standards focus on topics such as la= nd cover, GML, geodesy, geppositioning.
It is important to note that, within one standard, multiple standards ar= e often referenced (Figure 1).
A scenario for ISO conformance for a land cover product derived from rad= ar data might follow the following steps:
Figures 2-4: Relationship Between = ISO Standards
In the end, the ISO family of standards is broad enough to allow for met= adata on everything from high-level mission strategies to the details of pr= ovenance and instrument structure. The child pages contains links= to normative references/standards pertinent to the generation and expansio= n of NASA ISO-19115 compliant metadata.
Additional Information
Thusfar, the NASA Best Practices for ISO 19115 have drawn upon conv= entions and extensions to ISO 19115:2003 and ISO 19115-2. They incorporate = other forward-looking elements such as ISO 19115-1, lineage and have room f= or stakeholder outreach and feedback. Figure 2 illustrates the paradig= m driving the Best Practices development process. (Figure 2).