ESCO is conducting a review of Atmospheric Composition Variable Standard Names (ESDS-RFC-043)
NASA's Earth Science Data and Information Systems (ESDIS) Standards Coordination Office (ESCO) is conducting a second round review of the Atmospheric Composition Variable Standard Name Convention (ESDS-RFC-043). This version of the document has been updated by the authors to reflect feedback received from the first round review. This version is provided to ensure that initial comments have been adequately addressed and is open to both past and new reviewers.
The document provides instructions on how to construct an atmospheric composition variable standard name using controlled vocabulary for different types of measurements conducted during atmospheric composition suborbital field studies. It is intended that the lists of controlled vocabulary comprising the standard names will be used to support and improve the data reporting and archiving from NASA suborbital field studies using the ICARTT 2.0 file format.
All review comments are due by January 13, 2023.
Quick Start for Reviewers
ESDIS uses the Jama online document review system to collect community comments on proposed standards, practices and technical information submitted to ESCO for review. Offline reviews, where you download the document and review questions, then respond via email, are also accepted. Quick instructions for each are below.
- What is your job function? Select one or more of: instrument scientist/data provider, data manager, data user, data scientist
- Does this proposed Convention and guidelines address questions you have had in designing/developing data products for use within your community? For broader use in the science community?
- Is there sufficient detail in the guidelines in the proposed Convention for generating atmospheric composition variable standard names?
- Would you be able to implement this proposed Convention and guidelines, and would their implementation make this aspect of your work easier?
- Would the implementation of these guidelines address the challenges faced by your users in finding, evaluating, and using their specific data of interest?
- Is there anything you measure that you cannot find in the controlled lists?
- Can you use the controlled lists (i.e., measurement category, corename, and attributes) to describe your measurements? If not, is it clear how to contact someone to add a new core name, descriptive attribute, or measurement category?
- Data distributor questions -
- Does this proposed Convention address questions/concerns you have discussed with your data providers?
- Would the use of standard variable names enable/facilitate data discovery for your users?
- Would the use of standard variable names facilitate ingest, archiving, and distribution?
- If data product developers follow this proposed Convention, will your work cataloging and supporting their data be easier? Does it conflict with any current practices?
- Data User questions -
- What type of data do you use? (satellite, model, in situ)
- What is your research discipline?
- Does the information provided in this proposed Convention address challenges you've encountered in finding, documenting, and evaluating your data of interest, and provide a better understanding of the data for your research?
- General questions for everyone -
- Which sections of the proposed Convention are most relevant to your area of work?
- Do you disagree with, or have concerns about, any of the guidelines?
- Are there additional recommendations that would help you?
- Are there any terminologies, or statements that could be communicated more clearly or more properly defined? If so, please explain.
- Would use of this proposed Convention and guidelines improve the usability and quality of the data product?
- Do you feel that the document should be endorsed as a NASA Earth Science Standards Convention document? Please provide a rationale for your answer, if not apparent from your responses to the above questions.
You may send any questions about the review to the ESCO staff at email@example.com.
Detailed instructions for Jama reviewers:
The benefit of using the Jama system is that you can easily comment on specific portions of the document and can see comments provided by others.
Review comments may be submitted via the Earthdata Jama document review system. If you already have access to the NASA Earthdata Jama system, please contact ESCO at firstname.lastname@example.org and let us know your Earthdata Login username so we can add to you the list of reviewers.
Once you are registered to provide a review, you will receive email from the ESCO Team with links to the documents under review. When you get the email, please follow the instructions to gain access to the documents and to begin the review.
In order to log in to the Jama system (i.e. to follow any of the Jama review links) you must have an Earthdata Login account with access to Jama. Use your Earthdata Login username and password to log in to Jama. Earthdata Login username and password recovery can be done at http://urs.earthdata.nasa.gov/
- A short Jama Guide for Reviewers
NOTE: Information on this page is subject to change.